Welcome to M1911.ORG
The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site


John needs your help
Please read this message.


Sponsors Panel
If you intend to buy something from the companies advertising above, or near the bottom of our pages, please use their banners in our sites. Whatever you buy from them, using those banners, gives us a small commission, which helps us keep these sites alive. You still pay the normal price, our commission comes from their profit, so you have nothing to lose, while we have something to gain. Your help is appreciated.
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Barrel to slide lug contact observation

THREAD CLOSED
This is an old thread. You can't post a reply in it. It is left here for historical reasons.Why don't you create a new thread instead?
  1. #1
    Join Date
    23rd September 2008
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    2,473
    Posts liked by others
    2

    Barrel to slide lug contact observation

    Hello,

    I build a home built custom last year and was fortunate enough to achieve three lug contact between the barrel and slide (mostly luck ). This was using a Kart Easy fit barrel.

    Yesterday I just shot my 1800 round after chrome which is about 2200 after I install the barrel. While cleaning and inspecting the parts yesterday I noticed that the number one lug contact area isn't shaped like the contact areas of lugs two and three.

    Here is a picture of the slide lugs:


    Here is the lug to barrel contact areas: (yellow is shown bellow the contact areas)


    Here are some pictures that show that the number one lug contact is mostly to the left

    Barrel in battery with full lug contact (91% of available vertical engagement)


    Here is a link-down photo showing contact on the left side of the slide lug.


    I find it interesting that most of the number one lug contact area in to the left of center of the slide.

    I wonder if this is by design?

    Rgds
    Eric

  2. #2
    Join Date
    25th September 2006
    Location
    South of Lake Superior
    Posts
    14,085
    Posts liked by others
    127
    Hello Eric:
    Quote Originally Posted by egumpher
    I wonder if this is by design?
    There is nothing in the Ordnance blueprints that indicates it's by design. Whatever contact there may be would be even from side to side, and not concentrated on one side. Maybe just something a tad off in the manufacture of the barrel and/or slide?

    Or possibly more chrome got deposited in some areas than got deposited in other areas (if that's even possible)?

    Cheers
    When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind. [Lord Kelvin]
    Last edited by niemi24s; 16th January 2011 at 11:17.


  3. #3
    Join Date
    7th November 2005
    Location
    Montgomery, Alabama
    Posts
    781
    Posts liked by others
    0
    The lug contact marks you're seeing are from cycling not from in battery. Most often mention of lug contact is in regards to the lug recess faces.

    Best,
    Jon

  4. #4
    Join Date
    23rd September 2008
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    2,473
    Posts liked by others
    2
    Thank you Jon,

    So the marks are from link down when the lugs are pulled down out of battery?

    The recoil spring should hold the barrel back at link-up...correct?

    When I set-up the barrel I dychem blued the barrel lugs. Installed the barrel in the slide with the bushing. Then I whacked the back of the barrel knees with a rubber mallet to see how much lug contact there was when the barrel was horizontally forward (locked) in the slide.

    I removed some material from the barrel lug faces until I got all three lugs to contact. The only drawback is that I ended up with 6-7 thou barrel movement / hood gap and a weird number one lug contact profile. I thought that it was a small price to pay to guarantee three lug contact.

    Rgds
    Eric
    Last edited by egumpher; 16th January 2011 at 12:27.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    7th November 2005
    Location
    Montgomery, Alabama
    Posts
    781
    Posts liked by others
    0
    Removing material from the barrel forward lug faces is fine, but should be done before hood fitting. The recoil spring only controls the slide. With the barrel tilted up at the chamber end 52' in battery the tops of the lugs can't touch, only when cycling. the marks on the are from the top of the barrel chamber area. Few 1911's have all three lug faces in contact with the slide, many only one. I do agree more is better, mostly for accuracy, more contact.

    Best,
    Jon

  6. #6
    Join Date
    23rd September 2008
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    2,473
    Posts liked by others
    2
    Hello,

    More:
    Now that the barrel lugs are equalizing after 2000+ round I thought that the contact area would become more uniform.

    Rgsd
    Eric

  7. #7
    Join Date
    23rd September 2008
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    2,473
    Posts liked by others
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by BigJon
    Removing material from the barrel forward lug faces is fine, but should be done before hood fitting. The recoil spring only controls the slide. With the barrel tilted up at the chamber end 52' in battery the tops of the lugs can't touch, only when cycling. the marks on the are from the top of the barrel chamber area. Few 1911's have all three lug faces in contact with the slide, many only one. I do agree more is better, mostly for accuracy, more contact.

    Best,
    Jon
    Thanks again,

    I tried and tried and tried to measure the barrel and slide to fit the lugs before I cut the hood but it didn't workout that way......there is nothing like experience huh...

    I wanted three lug contact for durability. All of my other production 45s experience some type of wear/breakage around 3000 rounds for what ever the reason so I started a project determined to build a more durable 45. My Springfield and Colt both went back for warranty work around 3000 rounds.

    Rgds
    Eric

  8. #8
    Join Date
    25th September 2006
    Location
    South of Lake Superior
    Posts
    14,085
    Posts liked by others
    127
    Hmm-m-m. Barrel goes max forward in slide when gun is fired. This means the forward vertical surfaces of barrel lugs/recesses come into hard pressure-locked contact with the aft vertical surfaces of the slide lugs/recesses. Like in this:



    And that's where I see the indications of contact on the slide lugs in Eric's photos. What am I missing here?
    When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind. [Lord Kelvin]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    23rd September 2008
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    2,473
    Posts liked by others
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by niemi24s
    Hmm-m-m. Barrel goes max forward in slide when gun is fired. This means the forward vertical surfaces of barrel lugs/recesses come into hard pressure-locked contact with the aft vertical surfaces of the slide lugs/recesses. Like in this:



    And that's where I see the indications of contact on the slide lugs in Eric's photos. What am I missing here?
    Exactly why I wanted three lug contact..........but the slide and barrel are harder than the original 1911s.

    I do want to understand if the marks I see are from "pressure-lock" or cycling..... inquiring minds want to know.....


    Edit added:

    Recall that the original 1911 design was build with soft slides and proof pressure ammo was fired by the armorer to equalized the all three lug contact.

    Modern modified Browning designs use one large lug because of the advance in materials (hardened slides) now allow/accept one lug.

    Thanks again
    Eric
    Last edited by egumpher; 16th January 2011 at 13:42.


  10. #10
    Join Date
    1st June 2004
    Location
    Lexington, North Carolina...or
    Posts
    11,260
    Posts liked by others
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by egumpher
    I do want to understand if the marks I see are from "pressure-lock" or cycling.....
    An analysis...going on what I can see in the first picture...and that's not really the best way to diagnose it, but...

    It looks like the lugs are being deformed from insufficient vertical engagement, and that the barrel fit started out with only lug #2 bearing the brunt. As #2 defromed, it brought #3 into the game, and as 2 and 3 deformed, it eventually got around to lug #1. Slide lug #1 wasn't/isn't dead square to barrel lug #1, hence the uneven wear pattern. Or...Barrel lug #1 isn't dead square to slide lug#1. It's 6 of one/half dozen of the other.

    Check the barrel lugs for similar stair-stepping and attendant flanging at the top front corners, and re-check the headspace while you're at it. My guess is that it's grown a bit, though not likely enough to cause a problem.

    Now that Lug#1 is coming in, the deformation probably won't progress very rapidly...but be sure to eyeball barrel lugs 2 and 3 for indication of cracking or shearing about every 500 rounds for a while.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Sponsors Panel
If you intend to buy something from Brownells, please use their banners above. Whatever you buy from them, gives us a small commission, which helps us keep these sites alive. You still pay the normal price, our commission comes from their profit, so you have nothing to lose, while we have something to gain. Your help is appreciated.
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

Non-gun-related supporters.
Thank you for visiting our supporters.