Welcome to M1911.ORG
The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site


John needs your help
Please read this message.


Sponsors Panel
If you intend to buy something from the companies advertising above, or near the bottom of our pages, please use their banners in our sites. Whatever you buy from them, using those banners, gives us a small commission, which helps us keep these sites alive. You still pay the normal price, our commission comes from their profit, so you have nothing to lose, while we have something to gain. Your help is appreciated.
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Old Timer...

THREAD CLOSED
This is an old thread. You can't post a reply in it. It is left here for historical reasons.Why don't you create a new thread instead?
  1. #1
    Join Date
    16th September 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    23
    Posts liked by others
    0

    Old Timer...

    Seeing my dissertation on this was x'ed out by me, I'll keep this one short... What does my friend have here? He is interested in value, insurance value and any historical info one may have regarding manufacture and possibly its early travels.

    Side note says I'm having issues posting pics so they will be posted in the comments if I cant get them in this post. Thanks to all.

    Thanks all...20240104_174533 (1).jpg20240104_174544 (1).jpg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    4th June 2004
    Posts
    2,852
    Posts liked by others
    189
    Primarily early parts, apparently refinished from these photos. Springfield grip panel left side; Colt right side. Is the face of the trigger serrated?

    Biggest issue the not original serial number. Mere possession of firearms with altered serial numbers constitutes a felony offense.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    16th September 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    23
    Posts liked by others
    0
    I do see the subtle difference between grip panels. What makes you believe the SS has been altered though?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    4th June 2004
    Posts
    2,852
    Posts liked by others
    189
    Font, style and location differ from Colt standard. Your photos appear to show the final acceptance stamp WGP used through approximately serial number 101000. These links from ColtAutos.com show serial number 3624 with early placement forward on the dust cover and serial number 20514 with normal placement. Serial number 3454 had forward placement if that's the original serial number restamped.

    http://www.coltautos.com/1911usmc_3624.htm

    http://www.coltautos.com/1911ci_20514.htm
    Likes (1) :
    Rick McC. (8th January 2024)


  5. #5
    Join Date
    9th June 2004
    Location
    Alabama, US
    Posts
    2,202
    Posts liked by others
    115
    Also, the prefix should be "No." not "NO".

    http://www.coolgunsite.com/images/19...8/1912na28.jpg
    Likes (1) :
    Rick McC. (8th January 2024)


  6. #6
    Join Date
    16th September 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    23
    Posts liked by others
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
    Also, the prefix should be "No." not "NO".

    http://www.coolgunsite.com/images/19...8/1912na28.jpg

    hmmm... Even in just these Photos I see deviations with the "number) abbreviation. My offering has capital "N". and "O", another has a capital "N" but a lower case "O" while the third picture will show a capital "N" and an UNDERSCORED small "O"...

    I also see where mine has a SQUARE period and not a round die punch for the period. I also see what looks like a "4" over a "4" and a "5" over a "5"... What I can't see is any reworking where an original SS could have lived prior to this one if in fact it was moved.

    Are there any other indications on this frame that could date this as a true under 4K number? All help appreciated. (Would Colt have information?)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    16th September 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    23
    Posts liked by others
    0
    Zooming in I see a 4 over a 4 and a 5 over a 5...weird...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    4th June 2004
    Posts
    2,852
    Posts liked by others
    189
    Some other indications of removed serials are dished out areas; sometimes detectable with a straight edge along the frame.
    Different thicknesses of the sides of the frame along the dustcover if surface ground.

    Mfg tolerances and worn tooling might affect these areas also.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    9th June 2004
    Location
    Alabama, US
    Posts
    2,202
    Posts liked by others
    115
    Serial number on the OP is in the wrong place for that early a gun, too.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    4th June 2004
    Posts
    2,852
    Posts liked by others
    189
    I mentioned incorrect placement if that was the original serial restamped. The OP never stated whether the trigger was serrated. MSH also possibly checkered.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Sponsors Panel
If you intend to buy something from Brownells, please use their banners above. Whatever you buy from them, gives us a small commission, which helps us keep these sites alive. You still pay the normal price, our commission comes from their profit, so you have nothing to lose, while we have something to gain. Your help is appreciated.
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

Non-gun-related supporters.
Thank you for visiting our supporters.