Welcome to M1911.ORG
The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site


Dear members,
Please make sure the email address we have for you, is correct and valid.


Sponsors Panel
If you intend to buy something from Brownells, Cabela's, TandemKros or Tekmat, please use their banners in our sites. Whatever you buy from them, gives us a small commission, which helps us keep these sites alive. You still pay the normal price, our commission comes from their profit, so you have nothing to lose, while we have something to gain. Also, don't forget to visit our other sponsors sites, click-throughs are appreciated by our advertisers. Your help is appreciated.
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

  • Section Widget

  • Categories Widget (Show All)

  • Recent Articles

  • 1911 MIM parts

    I had a guy come to me a few years back with a NRM 01991 Colt Government model. He requested that I replace the MIM sear and disconnect with his new parts. We'd discussed it some weeks earlier, and I told him that it was probably a waste of time and money.

    After the swap, I asked him if he wanted to keep his old parts, and he said no...so I did a little demonstration for him.

    I laid the sear on an anvil...cupped side down...and gave it 2-3 brisk whacks with a 4-ounce ball peen hammer. It didn't shatter into a million tiny pieces. It didn't even crack...and when I installed it in one of my pistols, it functioned just fine, albeit with a pretty rough trigger action.

    Then, I clamped the disconnect up in a vise and whacked it with the same hammer. It bent, but it didn't break.

    Good MIM is pretty good stuff. Bad MIM...not so much. Colt has apparently found a good vendor for its MIM parts. In the early days, Kimber did likewise. As time went on, they either changed vendors or their current vendor's QC went down. From what I understand, that problem has been rectified, and they're using good MIM again.

    Another part of the MIM problem is using it in applications where it really shouldn't be used. As a rule, it doesn't fare very well with impact. That may have changed with better technology, but I wouldn't bet too heavily on it.

    The big problem is that...without an X-Ray or magnaflux test...it's impossible to determine whether the part is good or bad unless it has a visible surface flaw.
    This article was originally published in forum thread: A question of MIM parts started by dirtywaterdiver View original post
  • Recent Forum Posts

    kenham

    1946 Hartford Sistema grips?

    Which grips are correct for a 1946 Hartford Sistema, checkered wood, brown plastic or black plastic? Or none of the above.

    kenham Today, 14:37 Go to last post
    robmkivseries70

    my first RIA

    Gorgeous looking piece.

    robmkivseries70 Today, 11:41 Go to last post
    DocWyatt

    5" r1

    Didn't try it myself. Left mine stock and it was the Commander style length. Shot great. Actually, I liked the flat MSH and it worked at well for me.

    DocWyatt Today, 09:28 Go to last post
    DocWyatt

    18.9 magazines?

    It's probably just my terrible eyesight, but the bullet in that top case appears to be "not seated to the correct length".

    DocWyatt Today, 09:05 Go to last post
    DocWyatt

    Hello from Montana

    Hello and welcome from Kansas. If your R1 is as good a shooter as the one I had, you'll enjoy it a lot.

    DocWyatt Today, 08:56 Go to last post



Sponsors Panel
If you intend to buy something from Brownells, please use their banners above. Whatever you buy from them, gives us a small commission, which helps us keep these sites alive. You still pay the normal price, our commission comes from their profit, so you have nothing to lose, while we have something to gain. Your help is appreciated.
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

Non-gun-related supporters.
Thank you for visiting our supporters.