Welcome to M1911.ORG
The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site


John needs your help
Please read this message.


Sponsors Panel
If you intend to buy something from the companies advertising above, or near the bottom of our pages, please use their banners in our sites. Whatever you buy from them, using those banners, gives us a small commission, which helps us keep these sites alive. You still pay the normal price, our commission comes from their profit, so you have nothing to lose, while we have something to gain. Your help is appreciated.
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

  • Section Widget

  • Categories Widget (Show All)

  • Recent Articles

  • 1911 MIM parts

    I had a guy come to me a few years back with a NRM 01991 Colt Government model. He requested that I replace the MIM sear and disconnect with his new parts. We'd discussed it some weeks earlier, and I told him that it was probably a waste of time and money.

    After the swap, I asked him if he wanted to keep his old parts, and he said no...so I did a little demonstration for him.

    I laid the sear on an anvil...cupped side down...and gave it 2-3 brisk whacks with a 4-ounce ball peen hammer. It didn't shatter into a million tiny pieces. It didn't even crack...and when I installed it in one of my pistols, it functioned just fine, albeit with a pretty rough trigger action.

    Then, I clamped the disconnect up in a vise and whacked it with the same hammer. It bent, but it didn't break.

    Good MIM is pretty good stuff. Bad MIM...not so much. Colt has apparently found a good vendor for its MIM parts. In the early days, Kimber did likewise. As time went on, they either changed vendors or their current vendor's QC went down. From what I understand, that problem has been rectified, and they're using good MIM again.

    Another part of the MIM problem is using it in applications where it really shouldn't be used. As a rule, it doesn't fare very well with impact. That may have changed with better technology, but I wouldn't bet too heavily on it.

    The big problem is that...without an X-Ray or magnaflux test...it's impossible to determine whether the part is good or bad unless it has a visible surface flaw.
    This article was originally published in forum thread: A question of MIM parts started by dirtywaterdiver View original post
  • Recent Forum Posts

    .45s r best

    Vihtavuori N3SL powder load data

    When powder is hard to find in my area, I have found that I can usually find something at the website Powder Valley. Their prices are reasonable given

    .45s r best 26th September 2022, 03:23 Go to last post
    BWDeadcat

    Vihtavuori N3SL powder load data

    Thank you for the reply.
    I agree: without specific data, and with so many other choices of propellants, it's hard to justify taking chances on an

    BWDeadcat 25th September 2022, 21:09 Go to last post
    .45s r best

    Vihtavuori N3SL powder load data

    I looked online at the powder you mention, I saw one sight that had a pound of it for sale. Their sight said it was 'slightly faster burning than N320'.

    .45s r best 25th September 2022, 18:50 Go to last post
    BWDeadcat

    Vihtavuori N3SL powder load data

    I acquired (at a price I couldn't pass up) most of a container of Vihtavuori N3SL powder.
    No recent load data guides even mention it.
    Reportedly

    BWDeadcat 23rd September 2022, 19:35 Go to last post



Sponsors Panel
If you intend to buy something from Brownells, please use their banners above. Whatever you buy from them, gives us a small commission, which helps us keep these sites alive. You still pay the normal price, our commission comes from their profit, so you have nothing to lose, while we have something to gain. Your help is appreciated.
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

Non-gun-related supporters.
Thank you for visiting our supporters.