![]() |
| Home | Contact Us | Mission Statement | Forum Rules | Moderator Rules | Legal | HelpDesk | Our Guestbook | The M1911 Pistols Organization | Donations |
|
|||||||
| Register | Activate | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Statistics |
| Go to our Home Page | Go to our E-zine |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Please note that the forums in this category are to be used to ask questions or to show us pistols from these manufacturers. They can also be used to ask questions about the parts of a particular pistol from one of these manufacturers, as long as the question relates to the original parts.
Messages with questions for after-market parts, magazines, holsters, conversion kits, ammo etc. will be moved to the proper forum and a warning will be issued. IMPORTANT: In Photo-threads, each post should contain at least one picture of your own. Quoting a previous post, does not make your post compliant with that requirement. Photo threads are NOT for chatting. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kimber Pro or Sig 245, If your life depends on it?
If your life depended on it, which one would you pick?
Kimber Pro CDP II Kimber Compact CDP II Kimber Tactical Pro II Sig Sauer 245 Sig Sauer 220 It will be carried in a VMII and needs to be well hidden. I have/like 45's (Kimber Ultra Carry II and Eclipse ULE II)but occasionally carry 40's (Sig 239, 229 and Kahr PM40). I'm an average size guy in decent shape and want another new toy, but it must be very reliable as I will use it for the majority of my concealed carry use. Thanks in advance |
|
|||
|
I went to the range with a friend of mine who owns a Pro CDP. I had my Sig 239 .40 cal. He let me shoot the Pro a few times and before I knew it, my Sig was back in the range bag not to be seen again that day. That Pro shot so smooth and accurate it made my Sig feel like a Saturday Night Special. Don't get me wrong, I really like the Sig but there was no comparison between the two guns.
|
|
||||
|
I should mention that I had a 2005 model Ultra CDP II (3") with an external extractor that Kimber could not make reliably extract. After 6 months, about 6 trips back to Kimber and $600 in test ammo they replaced it with a 2004 model (with internal extractor). That pistol has been wonderful. So much so that I bought another NIB 2002 Ultra CDP Elite (pictured, upper right of post).
Personally, I would avoid any 3" external extractor (and maybe even 4"). Kimber seems to be replacing the slides on external extractor 3" (and maybe 4") 1911s with internal extractors for those owners returning theirs with extractor problems. There seems to be a trend here. Manu are thinking there are going to be less external extractors in the years to come. Maybe the 3" (and perhaps 4") 1911s will move away from them. It will be interesting to see hat the 2006 catalog shows... Now there are many people with no problems and you don't tend to hear from them. Still, based on the evidence, it is something to consider IMHO. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Sig Sauer 220
__________________
"The pistol, learn it well, carry it always ..." - Jeff Cooper
|
|
|||||
|
Personally, I would choose a handgun with the same operating system that I was familiar with for home and carry. You mentioned handguns that have three different operating systems (some would say two). Depending on your level of experience with each operating system, to me, would be a deciding factor on what to carry. Having said that, and this being a 1911 forum, I would go with a Kimber Pro model.
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the information. I have an ultra carry II (three inch, 2005 stainless) that has been temperamental. My Eclipse is the same size/year and seems to function perfect every time (350ish rounds so far). The goal here is one gun, constant carry.
Warm Rain: I will give the raptor a look. BrianNJ: Was there any problems/FTE. OD: My Sigs seem very reliable, and the Kimbers maybe more of a break in is in order. So now you see my dilemma. Radar: I am equally familiar with each operating system and want to stick with only one for self defense, the rest will be for the safe and/or occasional recreational use. At least that's my plan. I prefer the look of the kimbers, but I don't want to bet my life on estetics. The reason I was looking at the 4 inch/Pros was hopefully to compare/increase reliability. Somehow I thought the longer I was in the hobby and the more information I gathered these decisions would be easier. It only has made me want more guns. ![]() |
|
|||
|
baja272:
There were no malfunctions at all. The CDP was 100% reliable in the 300 or so rounds we fired. My buddy was firing some very fast controlled pairs and there were no malfunctions with those either. I was very impressed. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
baja272,
It is probably wise to go with that which you are familiar.
__________________
"The pistol, learn it well, carry it always ..." - Jeff Cooper
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Interesting Firearms-related sites |
|
| Cool Gunsite : http://www.coolgunsite.com/ - Cornered Cat : http://www.corneredcat.com/ | |
| Go to our Home Page | Go to our E-zine |
|
|
|