The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site - A Question re: "reserved for receivers" 1911's
Home
Welcome to M1911.ORG
The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site
Contact Us Mission Statement Forum Rules Moderator Rules Legal HelpDesk Our Guestbook Donations

Go Back   The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site > Collector's Corner > US Military Issue M1911 and M1911A1 Pistols
User Name
Password
Register Activate FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Have you checked the M1911.ORG E-zine lately? Click here to visit it.
Reviews of the latest M1911 models and much more.


Have you registered in our Gun-Politics.ORG site?

Sponsors Panel





M1911.ORG proudly presents you our folding knife.

Read all about it and order yours today.

 
This is an old thread. You can't post a reply in it. It is left here for historical reasons.Why don't you create a new thread instead?
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
United States  Old 2nd June 2004, 10:09
RayP. RayP. is offline
Senior Member
 
User ID: 234
Join Date: 1st June 2004
Location: Indiana(by the Chicago line)
Posts: 213 
What are these?....

I'm not up on all the various collectibles so I have a question about these pistols,Clawson states that Heart cuts began about #375000 (Apr.29-1918) so what are these,replacement frames with the ser#'s of the original frames they replaced or something else?

RayP.

  #3  
Old 2nd June 2004, 10:45
dsk
Guest
 
User ID:
Posts: n/a 
Hi Ray,

Prior to 1918 Colt was required to ship pistols in sequential order. If one pistol was rejected, the entire batch was held up until a replacement pistol could be made and accepted. In order to prevent this sort of thing, Colt had unnumbered pistols made in advance, that could be stamped with the rejected pistol's serial number and added to the batch going out. These pistols are identified by having the S/N stamped after finish. Aside from that I don't know a whole lot more about them.

  #4   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
United States  Old 2nd June 2004, 12:22
RayP. RayP. is offline
Senior Member
 
User ID: 234
Join Date: 1st June 2004
Location: Indiana(by the Chicago line)
Posts: 213 
Amazing,

in that all the little bits of changes and what ever that occured during the time of manufacture didn't mean a thing to anyone then but have created so much wonder so many years later,sure would like to know if there is a 80/90 year old file cabinet(cardboard/wood box) sitting in some old arsenal basement just full of shop notes,letters of authorizations,delivery receipts for materials (such as "Savage" slides) and the like,just some old place some one stuffed paperwork from around 1912/13 to 1945 or so,sure would be interesting reading.

RayP.

  #5  
Old 2nd June 2004, 12:27
dsk
Guest
 
User ID:
Posts: n/a 
BTW you can read more info on these in Clawson's latest book.

  #6   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
United States  Old 2nd June 2004, 15:09
RayP. RayP. is offline
Senior Member
 
User ID: 234
Join Date: 1st June 2004
Location: Indiana(by the Chicago line)
Posts: 213 
Source of data....

Replacement pistols on page 3 of Clawson's 1st. small book(90 pager). In short he states that a true replacement pistol will have all the assembler's stamps and everything else done in the usual manner with the one exception being that the ser# is applied after the finish there by breaking the finish. He states that 149 such replacement pistols are in Colt's ledgers but it is suspected that many more were produced. I would sure look them so called Lunch Box pistols over real close,true Lunch Box pistols won't have all the marks/stamps but excess replacement pistols will have finish and all the stamps except for the ser#.(at least that's the way I read it).

RayP.

  #7  
Old 2nd June 2004, 21:55
rstrykert rstrykert is offline
Junior Member
 
User ID: 201
Join Date: 1st June 2004
Posts: 12 
"Salt E.",

Give it a rest. Nobody believes anything you say anyway.

  #8   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
Greece  Old 3rd June 2004, 02:26
John's Avatar
John John is offline
El Commandante
 
User ID: 1
Join Date: 29th May 2004
Location: Athens, Greece, Earth
Posts: 23,891 
  Send a message via MSN to John
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salt E.
Well enough cordial hellos and introductions, Red, and let's get back on the topic of replacement receivers. You seem to know, or think you know, or at least "believe" quite a lot about them, given their extreme rarity. I counted 3 "I believe's" in your post. Where are the references you have acquired all these beliefs from?

Red, so how's the new camera working what was it a Kodak digital? Weren't you planning to show off other views of your Singer S800403? Now's as good a time as any don't you think, or should I say, don't you "believe"? I hear that one was a real piece of work, so where's the pics? There's nothing to hide or be embarrassed about, after all it is a real Singer . . . . . . . . . isn't it, Red?

Who is Red? I see no one using that user name, participating in this thread.

Clarifications please?

Also, I would appreciate if your postings were a bit more polite. Using "I believe" shows a rare quality, understanding that one's knowledge is limited is not too common, at least that's what it looks like. Your comments are directly offending another member, I assume Scott. Please read the Forum Rules and respect them.

Thank you
__________________
John Caradimas SV1CEC
The M1911 Pistols Organization
http://www.m1911.org
  #9  
Old 3rd June 2004, 11:33
dsk
Guest
 
User ID:
Posts: n/a 
Salt E.,

It seems you are on a personal crusade to slander people. This is a new forum with plenty of untapped raw potential. We have already attracted some of the more respected members of the collecting community to come and share their knowledge and experience. They deserve a place to openly discuss our hobby free from personal attacks of this nature. They, the owner of this site, and I also know you from the other forums and what you're doing. My suggestion is for you go take up your "crusade" elsewhere.

Regards,

DSK

  #10   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
Greece  Old 3rd June 2004, 13:57
John's Avatar
John John is offline
El Commandante
 
User ID: 1
Join Date: 29th May 2004
Location: Athens, Greece, Earth
Posts: 23,891 
  Send a message via MSN to John
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salt E.
Well enough cordial hellos and introductions, Red, and let's get back on the topic of replacement receivers. You seem to know, or think you know, or at least "believe" quite a lot about them, given their extreme rarity. I counted 3 "I believe's" in your post. Where are the references you have acquired all these beliefs from?

Red, so how's the new camera working what was it a Kodak digital? Weren't you planning to show off other views of your Singer S800403? Now's as good a time as any don't you think, or should I say, don't you "believe"? I hear that one was a real piece of work, so where's the pics? There's nothing to hide or be embarrassed about, after all it is a real Singer . . . . . . . . . isn't it, Red?

Salt E.

dsk expressed my exact feelings. If you have a problem with respecting the forum rules, please spend your time in other forums. Such attitude is not welcome here and never will.
__________________
John Caradimas SV1CEC
The M1911 Pistols Organization
http://www.m1911.org
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Have you checked the M1911.ORG E-zine lately? Click here to visit it.
Reviews of the latest M1911 models and much more.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05.

Page generated in 0.12794 seconds (93.78% PHP - 6.22% MySQL) with 14 queries

Copyright © John Caradimas 1994-present
The M1911 Pistols Organization

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.