![]() |
| Home | Contact Us | Mission Statement | Forum Rules | Moderator Rules | Legal | HelpDesk | Our Guestbook | The M1911 Pistols Organization | Donations |
|
|||||||
| Register | Activate | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Statistics |
| Go to our Home Page | Go to our E-zine |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Please note that the forums in this category are to be used to ask questions or to show us pistols from these manufacturers. They can also be used to ask questions about the parts of a particular pistol from one of these manufacturers, as long as the question relates to the original parts.
Messages with questions for after-market parts, magazines, holsters, conversion kits, ammo etc. will be moved to the proper forum and a warning will be issued. IMPORTANT: In Photo-threads, each post should contain at least one picture of your own. Quoting a previous post, does not make your post compliant with that requirement. Photo threads are NOT for chatting. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ultra II velocities?
At the range today with a chrono and Ultra Raptor, I was shocked at the following avg. velocitites from 230 gr. loads:
Winchester FMJ white box - 375 fps PMC FMJ Bronze - 395 fps Cor-Bon HP - 535 fps Is this sad performance normal for a 3" barrel? I don't much want to switch to lighter bullets. Does anyone manufacture a +P 230 gr. FMJ? I'm pretty confident of the readings as the .357 Mag. and .45 Colt loads read as expected. Mike |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I'd have to say that something is wrong. Velocity in the short barrel shouldn't fall off nearly that much compared to a 5 inch barrel. I'd give it another try.
One thing you might try is moving the screens back another couple of feet. You get a lot of muzzle flash with the short barrel, and the flash can be read by the chrono and distort the results. DVC
__________________
adapt, improvise, overcome "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.", Carl Sagan "One should shoot as quickly as one can -- but no quicker.", Jeff Cooper |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I think you must have had something on the chrono set wrong. My tests of multiple ammunition types and brands showed that, in general, compared to a government model you lose approximately 15 to 20 percent of muzzle velocity when shooting the same ammo through a 3" barrel. Your velocities are less than half.
Does your chrono have a setting for how far apart the two screens are? If they were 2 feet apart, ir it possible you had it set for 4 feet or 6 feet?
__________________
Hawkmoon On a good day, can hit the broad side of a barn ... from the inside
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Recently measured 750-760fps average 230gr WW white box thru my Kiber Ultra Covert II. Wolf came thru at 725 fps average.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks everybody, it'a a relief to hear that others fare better.
It's hard to imagine though, that the 4" .357 readings didn't suffer from muzzle blast interference, and the 3" Kimber did. Nonetheless, I'll try again further back. Screens were set OK judging other cailber performance. Incidently, penetration with all was 1.5 pressure-treated 2x6"s, which does seem to make 375fps a too slow reading. Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Interesting Firearms-related sites |
|
| Cool Gunsite : http://www.coolgunsite.com/ - Cornered Cat : http://www.corneredcat.com/ | |
| Go to our Home Page | Go to our E-zine |
|
|
|