The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site - 160gr cast load
Welcome to M1911.ORG
The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site
Home Contact Us Mission Statement Forum Rules Moderator Rules Legal HelpDesk Our Guestbook Donations

Go Back   The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site > The Parts Bin > Ammo & Reloading
User Name
Password
Register Activate FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics
Go to our Home Page Go to our E-zine

Please visit our Sponsors
Ruger
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

Important message
Please keep in mind that M1911.ORG is not responsible for any handloads presented in here, by members. Use basic handloading precautions when trying out new loads. Always compare to existing published data, from reputable sources. Use common sense when reading handload recipes.

This forum is to be used for questions pertaining to 1911 calibers. Do not use it to ask questions about ammo for other firearms or for ammo that a 1911 was never chambered for.


 
This is an old thread. You can't post a reply in it. It is left here for historical reasons.Why don't you create a new thread instead?
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
United States  Old 11th March 2005, 20:37
gopherGrease gopherGrease is offline
New Member
 
User ID: 3032
Join Date: 11th March 2005
Posts: 6 
160gr cast load

I'm looking for some thoughts on useing 160gr cast in .45acp. Powders on hand are Win 231 and Bullseye. Is any one useing this bullet with one ether powder? If so what works for you, and did you need to use a lighter recoil spring?
Thanks for the info.

  #2   Quote post in private message
Old 11th March 2005, 21:34
Recon's Avatar
Recon Recon is offline
Old Timer
 
User ID: 1437
Join Date: 5th November 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 743 
gopherGrease:

I'm using the 152 and 155 both with all stock springs in my Kimber 5". Actually my best performing bullet of any is the 155. I still shoot all the way up to 200, however. Depends on the course of fire. I have 160s on order.

Penn Bullets includes load data with their 152. WW231 min of 7.1 grs @ 1040 fps and max of 7.7 grs @ 1144 fps. With Bullseye they report a min of 6.2 grs @ 1051 fps and a max of 6.7 grs @ 1164 fps. I have not tried either of these.

They also list loads for the 152 using Trap 100, 700x, Unique, AA #2, AA#5 and Win WST. I haven't tried any of these powders either.

My load runs about 1050 fps and easily cycles the gun. Feels like a light load recoil wise.

  #3   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
United States  Old 12th March 2005, 06:49
gopherGrease gopherGrease is offline
New Member
 
User ID: 3032
Join Date: 11th March 2005
Posts: 6 
Thanks Recon,
I am looking at getting the LEE 160rf mold. Wasn't sure if I would need lighter springs, and if accuracy was any good.

  #4   Quote post in private message
United States  Old 16th March 2005, 19:49
Gammon Gammon is offline
Old Timer
 
User ID: 496
Join Date: 28th June 2004
Location: Medford, MA 02155 USA
Posts: 1,208 
I have used a 175gr swc and got 1020fps with 6.7gr of WW 231. The bullet is basically an H&G #68 with a shortened base. Accuracy was not as good as the 200gr swc. I have experimented with many bullet designs and found the #68 200gr swc to be best all around choice, as long as the pistol will feed it. Problem guns will either need the attention of a gunsmith or RN ammo.

  #5   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
United States  Old 16th March 2005, 21:09
gopherGrease gopherGrease is offline
New Member
 
User ID: 3032
Join Date: 11th March 2005
Posts: 6 
Gammon,
Your right I do get my best with a 200swc, I'm using the RCBS mould.
Loading it with 5.5 of Win 231.
With the 160 I'm looking for a load that has very little recoil.
The near by range has started a new game, some what like the Steel challenge. All autos shoot in the same class, so to compete with the 9mm boys I need to cut my loads down a bit. 8" disks out to 25 yards.

  #6   Quote post in private message
United States  Old 17th March 2005, 05:18
Gammon Gammon is offline
Old Timer
 
User ID: 496
Join Date: 28th June 2004
Location: Medford, MA 02155 USA
Posts: 1,208 
I would go with 5.0 of 231 and the 200gr bullet. This will give you about 800fps with very little recoil. Be careful, you mught need to use a lower powered recoil spring for 100% reliability.

 


Sponsors Panel
Please visit our sponsors
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Interesting Firearms-related sites
Cool Gunsite : http://www.coolgunsite.com/ - Cornered Cat : http://www.corneredcat.com/


Go to our Home Page Go to our E-zine

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55.

Page generated in 0.37670 seconds (94.80% PHP - 5.20% MySQL) with 15 queries

Copyright © John Caradimas 1994-present
The M1911 Pistols Organization

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Non-gun-related supporters.
Thank you for visiting our supporters.