The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site - Range Report: SA Mil-Spec .45 ACP...
Welcome to M1911.ORG
The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site
Home Contact Us Mission Statement Forum Rules Moderator Rules Legal HelpDesk Our Guestbook Donations

Go Back   The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site > M1911 Manufacturers > Springfield
User Name
Password
Register Activate FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics
Go to our Home Page Go to our E-zine

Please visit our Sponsors
Ruger
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING - IMPORTANT MESSAGE - PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Please note that the forums in this category are to be used to ask questions or to show us pistols from these manufacturers. They can also be used to ask questions about the parts of a particular pistol from one of these manufacturers, as long as the question relates to the original parts.

  • If your pistol malfunctions and you want to ask for help on how to troubleshoot it, post your question in the "Gunsmithing and Refinishing" forum, not in this one.
  • If you want to ask questions about after-market parts, these questions should go in the "Parts - Grips" forum, not in the manufacturers forums.
  • If you want to ask questions about after-market magazines, these questions should go in the "Magazines" forum, not in these forums.
  • If you want to ask questions about holsters, those questions should go in the "Holsters" forum, not in these forums.
  • If you want to ask questions about conversion kits, those questions should go in the "Conversion Kits" forum, not these forums.
  • If you want to ask questions about which ammo to use with your pistol, those questions should be posted in the "Ammo" forum, not these forums.

Messages with questions for after-market parts, magazines, holsters, conversion kits, ammo etc. will be moved to the proper forum and a warning will be issued.

IMPORTANT: In Photo-threads, each post should contain at least one picture of your own. Quoting a previous post, does not make your post compliant with that requirement. Photo threads are NOT for chatting.


 
This is an old thread. You can't post a reply in it. It is left here for historical reasons.Why don't you create a new thread instead?
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
United States  Old 5th January 2005, 14:40
Stephen A. Camp Stephen A. Camp is offline
Old Timer
Deceased Member
 
User ID: 5
Join Date: 31st May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 299 
Range Report: SA Mil-Spec .45 ACP...

Hello. Having owned SA handguns off and on for a number of years now, I decided to try the parkerized Mil-Spec. For those interested, SA designates it as "PB9108L". I'd owned a couple of Mil-Specs some years ago, but managed to trade or sell them.

I had seen and shot a friend's WWII GI Mil-Spec, which is now called something else by SA and was most impressed with the barrel-to-slide and frame-to-slide fit, but I had been satisfied with the sights that came on the "regular" Mil-Spec and opted to go that route.

These pistols can be found under or right at the $500 mark from what I've seen...at least in my neck of the woods.

The Pistol: This gun came with the standard GI grip safety and spur hammer and checkered black plastic grips. The frame and slide are parkerized and the finish is even and not unattractive. The fixed sights are of the 3-dot variety and the front sight is a non-serrated ramp as opposed to the post sight on my earlier Mil-Specs. The trigger is short and grooved and the arch, grooved mainspring housing does have the integral lock.

I was surprised to see that the barrel in my gun was stainless steel and new to me was the small groove cut in the top of the barrel hood to act as a visual loaded chamber indicator.


The Mil-Spec is somewhat spartan, but this one turned out to be reliable and accurate. It is not without faults, however.

Unlike it's WWII Springfield cousin, the Mil-Spec has a lowered ejection port and the magazine well is beveled nicely. It came with one 7-round magazine.

Shooting: On two ocassions now, I've fired just over 600 rounds throught this pistol. These included FMJ, flat-points, factory JHP's, and handloads with both CSWC bullets and JHP bullets.

After the first session, I replaced the standard GI grip safety with a drop-in from Pachmayr that works fine with the spur hammer. The reason was that I was getting eatten alive by both the hammer spur and the sharp edges of the grip safety. I've had this problem with about every 1911 I've ever shot that was in this configuration. The wide grip safety stopped my being more chewed up, but managed to rub off the rather deep scabs from the previous session.

Due to rain and wind, shooting was confined to 10, 15, and 25 yards. No chronograph work was done as I didn't care to set it up in the rain, but I will check out this particular gun in the near future. I expect it will fall in line with my other 5" guns.

10 Yards: Nothing fancy a tall, just some controlled pairs fired starting from a low-ready position and a few failure to stop drills thrown in.


I found the sights easy to pick up for controlled pairs. Each set was fired in something under a second. The trigger pull on this gun is heavy, but that will be remedied in the near future.

15 Yards: Shooting from this distance was done standing and using a two-hand hold in slow-fire.


I was VERY pleased to find that the fixed sights were "on" for me. Many times this is not the case. I suspect that the group being very slightly to the left with a few shots low and left are due to the somewhat heavy trigger pull. I'd estimate it as 7 or 8 pounds. This will be changed in the near future.

25 Yards: Groups fired at 25 yards were done in slow-fire while seated and my wrists braced.


This group was fired using Federal 230-gr. HydraShok JHP in the "old" version, ie, truncated cone bullet rather than the current one having the more rounded ogive.

Observations: The gun was utterly reliable. It fired a total of just over 600 rounds w/o cleaning and the number of malfunctions was exactly zero. There were no failures to feed, fire, or eject. The slide locked open only when it was supposed to.

For those interested, a more detailed report is at:

http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/...il%20Spec.ht m

This one is a keeper.

Best.

  #2   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
United States  Old 8th January 2005, 21:04
koli koli is offline
New Member
 
User ID: 2124
Join Date: 8th January 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2 
Thanks for the info. This is the second good report that I have read on these pistols. I just purchased an OD Green one this week and can't wait to get out and shoot it. It is my first .45 ACP. My other pistols include:

Glock 19
Ruger MK I
Ruger GP 100
Ruger Single Six .22/.22mag

  #3   Quote post in private message
Old 9th January 2005, 10:30
Rather-B-Huntin Rather-B-Huntin is offline
New Member
 
User ID: 2126
Join Date: 8th January 2005
Location: West Virginia, USA
Posts: 22 
Thanks a bunch. You've pretty well convinced me to build a project gun out of a SA Mil-Spec, instead of starting with a SA GI model or a Rock Island.

  #4   Quote post in private message
United States  Old 10th January 2005, 00:19
Spitfire's Avatar
Spitfire Spitfire is offline
New Member
 
User ID: 1007
Join Date: 15th September 2004
Location: Orlando Fl
Posts: 25 
Thanks

Glad you liked it Stephen. Unfortunately now with your review of the milspec I am afraid they will be less plentiful on the shelves. But word was bound to get out sometime about this nice bang for the buck pistol.
__________________
Tommy Hooks

No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation
- General Douglas MacArthur
  #5   Quote post in private message Quote post in an email
United States  Old 10th January 2005, 09:27
koli koli is offline
New Member
 
User ID: 2124
Join Date: 8th January 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2 
Quote:
Originally Posted by koli
Thanks for the info. This is the second good report that I have read on these pistols. I just purchased an OD Green one this week and can't wait to get out and shoot it. It is my first .45 ACP. My other pistols include:

Glock 19
Ruger MK I
Ruger GP 100
Ruger Single Six .22/.22mag


Oop, I made a mistake. I purchased the GI model not the mil spec. model.
However, I have read a couple of good reports on the GI model as well.

  #6   Quote post in private message
Old 11th January 2005, 08:52
mrgraywolf's Avatar
mrgraywolf mrgraywolf is offline
New Member
 
User ID: 2153
Join Date: 11th January 2005
Location: Middle GA
Posts: 20 
MilSPec 1911 Springfield

I bought my MilSpec as I am an ex army guy and that was what I liked to shoot. I looked at H&K, GLOCK, SIG, S&W, COLT etc, handled each model, racked the slides, dry fired , and each time I kept coming back to the black gun in the blue case. I bought it cause it fit me, and since I have run thousands of rounds thru it, ( only failed to feed when really dry and very dirty) ( I was testing it ) oil it clean it functions forever. I added a Hogue finger grip and ed Brown full length guide rod, and bushing, and I had put compensator bushings on it, run buff pads, different springs etc, all in all , its agreat pistol. At 30 yards I can chew out the center of standar pistol targets, ( those hi vis targets are really fun).

My latest Springfield was a TRP, and it shoots dead on at 50 yards, ( the guys at the gun range were a tad impressed as I put a single round dead center on a pistol target at the farthest point back in the range). And recently was able to nail head sized a pumpkin at 162 feet ( verified with one of the wheel things by a phone company guy).

I am seriously looking at the new .50 GI man what blast that has to be shooting concrete blocks at 25 yards!!!!!!
__________________
Gun Control :: Being able to repeatedly hit your intended target. 1911..... is there anything else?
  #7   Quote post in private message
Old 11th January 2005, 09:01
mrgraywolf's Avatar
mrgraywolf mrgraywolf is offline
New Member
 
User ID: 2153
Join Date: 11th January 2005
Location: Middle GA
Posts: 20 
My MilSPec Results

[IMG][/IMG] Just a note to let you know that you dont need a 2700 wilson or clark or brown ( though we all dream of them ) to shoot well.

Its the shooter, the man behind the gun, that is the true weapon.[IMG]C:\etcpikx\1911\30ft[/IMG]
__________________
Gun Control :: Being able to repeatedly hit your intended target. 1911..... is there anything else?
 


Sponsors Panel
Please visit our sponsors
If you want to become a sponsor and see your banner in the above panel, click here to contact us.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Interesting Firearms-related sites
Cool Gunsite : http://www.coolgunsite.com/ - Cornered Cat : http://www.corneredcat.com/


Go to our Home Page Go to our E-zine

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:58.

Page generated in 0.31360 seconds (95.73% PHP - 4.27% MySQL) with 13 queries

Copyright © John Caradimas 1994-present
The M1911 Pistols Organization

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Non-gun-related supporters.
Thank you for visiting our supporters.