![]() |
| Home | Contact Us | Mission Statement | Forum Rules | Moderator Rules | Legal | HelpDesk | Our Guestbook | The M1911 Pistols Organization | Donations |
|
|||||||
| Register | Activate | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Statistics |
| Go to our Home Page | Go to our E-zine |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Please note that the forums in this category are to be used to ask questions or to show us pistols from these manufacturers. They can also be used to ask questions about the parts of a particular pistol from one of these manufacturers, as long as the question relates to the original parts.
Messages with questions for after-market parts, magazines, holsters, conversion kits, ammo etc. will be moved to the proper forum and a warning will be issued. IMPORTANT: In Photo-threads, each post should contain at least one picture of your own. Quoting a previous post, does not make your post compliant with that requirement. Photo threads are NOT for chatting. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Commander - Colt vs. Kimber
I am looking for a commander size pistol in .45 and am looking at the the Kimber Pro CDP II versus one of the new Colt Commander model O4691.
This will be a carry pistol and would be satisfied with the features found on the standard Colt. The Kimber is obviously a well made pistol with nice features but I am not sure it is worth the premium price over the cost of the Colt. I am wary of buying a Colt having heard the quality is not as good as it used to be. Does anyone have any experience with a new Colt? I see also that Springfield is making a Commander in their US GI line, anyone have any experience with those? Any input from the group would be appreciated. Thanks. |
|
||||
|
The Kimber CDP Compact is a reliable pistol in my experience. This is slightly smaller than a Commander as it has a 4" (vs. 4.25") bbl and the smaller Officer ACP frame. I recently sold mine for reasons unrelated to reliability.
I have three (3) Commander sized pistols and prefer this size. Full sized magazines and a bit handier barrel length than the Government Model. 1967 Colt's Commander. This has an alloy frame. This pistol was presented to me new and has been around the world with me. Carried but not a lot of rounds thru her. Surprisingly little holster wear. The horrible sights vs. sentimental value have kept me from modifying her although I did have a drop in beavertail grip safety on her for several years. 2004 Para Ordnance LTC. This also has an alloy frame 4-1/4" bbl and is the direct replacement for the Commander. Para ramped barrel and PXT extractor were the primary reasons for this pistol. Light, reliable, and inexpensive. A few dollars in back parts to de-Kimberize her. 2004 Ed Brown Kobra Carry. This is my 4-1/4" bbl primary CHL weapon. All stainless steel, so she's heavier but has no corrosion or rust issues. There's also a bit (OK, a lot) of vanity in this pistol (like a Lincoln Aviator vs. an Explorer!), but she's been dead accurate and 100% reliable since she came out of the bag (no box with these). Pay your money and take your choices! Para and Colt's have all stainless models now. If anyone ever comes up with a natural anodized alloy frame and stainless slide it could become my lightweight carry pistol. -- Chuck |
|
||||
|
Honestly I'm looking at a compact or subcompact Kimber as well, and something I keep hearing about is that reliability problems increase the smaller you go. As well as springs wearing out far faster. Does anyone have any experience with these problems?
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Love, you might also look at the S&W 1911sc--scandium framed commander sized pistol and the Para LTC (either steel or alloy frame)commander sized also.
Jeff
__________________
Blessed are the bewildered for they won't notice--Tweak |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have sold my Kimber Pro II SS TLE/RL. The ejection problems were never solved. It now has a home with a SOG friend who likes "the challange" of working on the trouble. I have seen several complaints on the Kimber site on these pages. I don't know if I got a troubled weapon or not. After three trips to the factory and 2000+ rds, it still was not reliable.
My Colt Combat Commander has the reliability I need for my CCW. I also shoot a Gold Cup Trophy and find the same reliability. I would not hesitate to own another Kimber. Just not in the bull barrel stuff...JV. |
|
|||
|
I have a pro cdp and love it,have over 4400 rds no trbls mechanicaly,just my lead swc. Try to find one with the internal extractor the newer ones have the external extractor and i think thats what the problem is,have fun shooting whatever you get. Another difference btwn the colt and kimber is cdp has the melt treatment where as the colt doesnt! My combat commander has some sharp edges where the cdp is smooth!
|
|
||||
|
Here's a photo of the Kimber Ultra external extractor.
Oh, yeah, that's a Failure to Extract shown in the photo as well. An all too common event with this pistol which took two trips to Kimber and still wasn't fixed until they sent me a replacement extractor. Failure to Extract locks the pistol solid. Be sure you have magazines with a lip extending beyond the front strap as you have to rip the mag out to cure the stoppage. Good luck! -- Chuck |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Interesting Firearms-related sites |
|
| Cool Gunsite : http://www.coolgunsite.com/ - Cornered Cat : http://www.corneredcat.com/ | |
| Go to our Home Page | Go to our E-zine |
|
|
|