View Full Version : Harrold School District Will Let Teachers Carry Guns
Pappy
16th August 2008, 11:14
FYI;
Harrold School District Will Let Teachers Carry Guns (http://www.texasguntalk.com/forums/gun-legislation/1932-harrold-school-district-will-let-teachers-carry-guns.html)
MoneyTree
16th August 2008, 11:48
It sounds like they have a workable plan . I like the teacher training aspect and think the idea is pretty well thought out over all . What kind of ammo would " minimize the risk of ricochet in school halls " ?
Dimarini
16th August 2008, 11:54
What kind of ammo would " minimize the risk of ricochet in school halls " ?
The type that remains in the bad guy. :D
MoneyTree
16th August 2008, 12:00
The type that remains in the bad guy. :DThat's exactly what Brenda just told me . I feel like a real :butthead:
DuckRyder
16th August 2008, 12:06
:appld:
It sounds like the Superintendent actually has common sense!!!
dogdollar
16th August 2008, 12:13
Yep, there's something fishy going on here.....this plan would actually enable the teachers to PROTECT our children and themselves........got to be something I'm missing.......
DD
gottripletsNC
16th August 2008, 12:14
There is a lot of new frangible ammunition out there now, and it works pretty good. The Glaser was one of the first marketable, and was ok, but there are others out there that are much better.
Extreme Shock is one, and it seems to work pretty good. It will penetrate the thin skin of a human, but then expands and basically turns to dust, if it hits a wall, it just turns to powder.
skiking8515
16th August 2008, 15:22
This is the kind of news I like to see as I'll be graduating this year and hopefully taking a teaching job somewheres in Pennsylvania. I wonder if it will spread?
MoneyTree
16th August 2008, 17:44
This is the kind of news I like to see as I'll be graduating this year and hopefully taking a teaching job somewheres in Pennsylvania. I wonder if it will spread? We can only hope . My eldest daughter quit being a teacher due to the atmosphere of our schools here in this part of Texas .
wichaka
16th August 2008, 20:35
Ever shoot frangible into gelatin for testing?
It doesn't work well, will shatter pretty much on contact. Not useful for anything but up close training.
garrettwc
17th August 2008, 00:02
+1 to Wichaka. The frangible stuff is pretty much a no-go. They market it as being used by Air Marshals and such because of the close confines in an airplane. That is pure baloney. Air Marshals (and pretty much everyone else should) rely on shot placement.
ranburr
17th August 2008, 04:53
What is interesting is that we are still teaching CHL students that schools are off limits for armed CHL holders. This was brought up in a local interview with the school super. Apparently, in TX and other states, you can petition to carry at schools. That is not a part of the law that the state openly talks about to anyone.
ranburr
Tom
17th August 2008, 07:36
I just heard about this on CNN this morning. Personally, I'm glad that this school district has taken this step. They obviously understand that the only way to prevent or shorten a tragedy like Columbine or Va Tech is to have people with guns already on the inside when a situation develops. Good for the students and citizens of Harrold.
Soft Walker
17th August 2008, 09:23
Once these examples are establiished and tested they can become models for other areas.
twin oaks
17th August 2008, 10:54
Once these examples are establiished and tested they can become models for other areas.
We can hope.
It may have been here, maybe elsewhere, but I read of a school up in the midwest (USA) that has ZERO problem with kids and guns. One of the reasons is that the school has a Trap and Skeet team. All the members of the team have their shotguns in their vehicles on school grounds. Apparently, educating the kids has worked.
Swampfox
18th August 2008, 10:38
This morning Fox news interviewed the super of the school district with the plan and one of another TX district that is adamently opposed.
The opposition's arguement is always that the risk of an authorized weapon hurting someone (even that of an armed commissioned security officer) is greater than the risk of injury from an "event".
I just don't get it.
vBulletin v3.0.13, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.