berkbw
31st December 2007, 15:17
"1st - do no harm".
An important consideration - taking into regard "the least common denomitater "
I "think" advising to weld a gun into a monolith just, somehow, doesn't make it..
It has been said that one can not know the "truth". And worse yet, convey a meaningful, safe part of it?
I have seen many instances where a petitioner [question bearer] was, seemingly, at least 30 yd. behind the starting blocks. And he/she was either a butte of a joke, or given instructions, which if followed, "Bozo"-like, could result in a non-optimal result.
This board has the highest amount of tech-truth on the net. No, not anywhere the volume of THR, but the best "bang for buck" on the net.
In the EU, publishing a link to some sort of BG is prosecutable.
Somehow, there is a question here. Maybe - "How do we do safe?"
b-
An important consideration - taking into regard "the least common denomitater "
I "think" advising to weld a gun into a monolith just, somehow, doesn't make it..
It has been said that one can not know the "truth". And worse yet, convey a meaningful, safe part of it?
I have seen many instances where a petitioner [question bearer] was, seemingly, at least 30 yd. behind the starting blocks. And he/she was either a butte of a joke, or given instructions, which if followed, "Bozo"-like, could result in a non-optimal result.
This board has the highest amount of tech-truth on the net. No, not anywhere the volume of THR, but the best "bang for buck" on the net.
In the EU, publishing a link to some sort of BG is prosecutable.
Somehow, there is a question here. Maybe - "How do we do safe?"
b-