View Full Version : .45 Super .40 Super .460 Rowland .400 Corbon
novak1911freak
29th March 2005, 16:34
Which of these four would be best suited as a defensive round if one were so inclined to choose one of these as a defensive caliber??? I'm leaning toward the .45 Super because you can shoot .45 ACP through the same gun without having to change anything on the gun like the barrel, any and all opinions would be great........thanks guys......
Sabre
29th March 2005, 16:58
The one with which you can best make holes in the target where they count.
stans
29th March 2005, 19:24
Seeing as how the ammo for none of the above is readily available at most sporting goods shops or Walmart, I'd say none of the above. Plain old 45 ACP with a good 230 grain JHP bullet is pretty hard to beat for defense. The extra power of +P or Super will do little other than to slow down a follow up shot.
eddailey
30th March 2005, 12:48
Seeing as how the ammo for none of the above is readily available at most sporting goods shops or Walmart, I'd say none of the above. Plain old 45 ACP with a good 230 grain JHP bullet is pretty hard to beat for defense. The extra power of +P or Super will do little other than to slow down a follow up shot.
stans is right on the money! With ANY of your choices over penetration would also be an issue.
FWIW I carry 230HP, standard pressure, and I don't feel a bit "under-gunned"!
Ed
grendelbane
1st April 2005, 19:37
With ANY of your choices over penetration would also be an issue
Under penetration could also be an issue! When hollow point bullets are going fast, (and all of these cartridges can push a bullet fast), its penetration is most likely to be less, not more. With non-expanding bullets, like FMJ, higher velocity results in deeper penetration.
As Captain Dylan Hunt says, "It's never easy!" :)
vBulletin v3.0.13, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.