Rather-B-Huntin
9th January 2005, 00:21
Howdy,
I'm a new user to this site, and 1911 pistols in general. I have considerable experience in shooting handguns, and have owned a Springfield 1911 previously. I unfortunaltly sold the Springfield several years ago to help purchase an O/U shotgun for skeet shooting and upland hunting.
Last year I began shooting competitivley in IDPA and similar Action Pistol events. I started out with a Glock, and still use it in IDPA SSP class, and recently purchased a Smith 625 to shoot in ESR class.
I have always fancied and been intrigued by the 1911 pistol, but the "loaded" versions tend to stay just out of my financial reach, and my gunsmithing skills dont extend much past changing sights and grips. I would like to have a good, mechanically sound, basic style 1911 to use as a platform to build a gun to shoot in IDPA CDP class. I need to keep total cost to between $600-$650. I've considered a Springfield GI model, then add on some "extras" (Videki style trigger/ Commander hammer/ Sights that I can actually see, preferably 3 dot/ possibly a Beavertail safety). After looking over the Brownells catalog, I can make these upgrades to the GI and stay pretty well within my budget. Then I saw RIA Government model at a local gun shop which cost about $60 less than the GI. The RIA, in addition to costing less, and IMO, has better "lines" than the GI. It comes standard with a flared and lowered ejection port, better magazine, nicer grips (I've always preferred smooth to checkered, especially on a 1911), and seems a better choice for what I want to do with the gun.
Now, after all I've said here, I'm basically looking for someone whom can make an honest comparison between the two guns to give me the confidence to "go ahead" with the purchase of the RIA Government model over the Springfield. As mentioned, I've had a Springfield before, and it performed flawlessly for me. I also compete with several guys who shoot Springfields (which began life as a plain jane and were doctored up into some real shooters, not the models that came from the factory with all the bells and whistles already installed) who regularly finish matches at the top of the CDP rankings. As far as doing the improvements to the gun, I'll be assisted by a fellow competitor whom is an excellent gunsmith and a 1911 enthusiast who has "built up" several nice guns that started from the humble GI beginings.
I'm not looking to make a silk purse from a sows ear, just want something reliable that wont cost me $2000.
So, there you have it guys, what I want in 10,000 words or less. Who can help me out here?
I'm a new user to this site, and 1911 pistols in general. I have considerable experience in shooting handguns, and have owned a Springfield 1911 previously. I unfortunaltly sold the Springfield several years ago to help purchase an O/U shotgun for skeet shooting and upland hunting.
Last year I began shooting competitivley in IDPA and similar Action Pistol events. I started out with a Glock, and still use it in IDPA SSP class, and recently purchased a Smith 625 to shoot in ESR class.
I have always fancied and been intrigued by the 1911 pistol, but the "loaded" versions tend to stay just out of my financial reach, and my gunsmithing skills dont extend much past changing sights and grips. I would like to have a good, mechanically sound, basic style 1911 to use as a platform to build a gun to shoot in IDPA CDP class. I need to keep total cost to between $600-$650. I've considered a Springfield GI model, then add on some "extras" (Videki style trigger/ Commander hammer/ Sights that I can actually see, preferably 3 dot/ possibly a Beavertail safety). After looking over the Brownells catalog, I can make these upgrades to the GI and stay pretty well within my budget. Then I saw RIA Government model at a local gun shop which cost about $60 less than the GI. The RIA, in addition to costing less, and IMO, has better "lines" than the GI. It comes standard with a flared and lowered ejection port, better magazine, nicer grips (I've always preferred smooth to checkered, especially on a 1911), and seems a better choice for what I want to do with the gun.
Now, after all I've said here, I'm basically looking for someone whom can make an honest comparison between the two guns to give me the confidence to "go ahead" with the purchase of the RIA Government model over the Springfield. As mentioned, I've had a Springfield before, and it performed flawlessly for me. I also compete with several guys who shoot Springfields (which began life as a plain jane and were doctored up into some real shooters, not the models that came from the factory with all the bells and whistles already installed) who regularly finish matches at the top of the CDP rankings. As far as doing the improvements to the gun, I'll be assisted by a fellow competitor whom is an excellent gunsmith and a 1911 enthusiast who has "built up" several nice guns that started from the humble GI beginings.
I'm not looking to make a silk purse from a sows ear, just want something reliable that wont cost me $2000.
So, there you have it guys, what I want in 10,000 words or less. Who can help me out here?