GaryMC
13th May 2006, 23:25
Good day to all the members here. I'm hoping you might be able to help me make a decision.
I started shooting when I was young, .22LR rifle, and into my early adult years. I'm now approaching 49, and would like to start shooting pistol as a sporting hobby. Currently, I see no need to carry for defensive purposes, however that may change.
My intent had been to purchase a Ruger MKIII .22LR, figuring it was all I would need. However, when at the gun shop, I was shown the Kimber Rimfire, in a 1911 style. I found this handgun to be very pleasing to me, both in terms of feel and balance, as well as weight. Then, I compared it to the Custom II, which was heavier, and I actually preferred that over the aluminum alloy frame of the Rimfire.
I am in a quandry, because I didn't really want to spend almost $700 for a .22LR pistol. I had planned, actually, on spending not too much more than $400 for a blued Ruger.
I can purchase the Custom II for about $640, and another $275 or so will get me the .22LR conversion kit, basically giving me two guns for under $1,000. While substantially more than what I wanted to pay, it may be a worthwhile investment at that price, but I am not sure.
This will be my first gun that I've owned, and needless to say, I'm very leery of making a mistake, especially when it comes to a gun purchase.
I was fortunate (well, kind of) to be able to rent a Springfield 1911 with the Kimber conversion and shoot it. The down side of that was the range I rented it from apparently didn't take really good care of the weapons they rented, and I had a 25% FTF or FTE rate. When the gun was 'deconverted', I looked at the slide and barrel on the conversion, and it was horrible. No wonder the gun didn't work well.
However, I do think that it grouped well at 7 yards or so with the 50' Rifle targets I was using. At least, for someone who hasn't picked up any kind of gun in 25+ years, and the last was a rifle!
So, the question comes down to this:
For someone who is looking to purchase a first time gun for target shooting, on the weekends, not interested in personal carry (at this time, but maybe in the future), and not currently interested in any kind of competition (who knows about that in the future), would you recommend:
A. A Ruger Mk III
B. The Kimber Rimfire in 1911 style
or
C. A Custom II with the Kimber Conversion.
and finally
D. you tell me!
Thank you in advance for helping me. I sure could use it.
By the way, the 1911 is, out of all the guns that I looked at so far, the nicest, and most natural gun I've looked at.
Gary
I started shooting when I was young, .22LR rifle, and into my early adult years. I'm now approaching 49, and would like to start shooting pistol as a sporting hobby. Currently, I see no need to carry for defensive purposes, however that may change.
My intent had been to purchase a Ruger MKIII .22LR, figuring it was all I would need. However, when at the gun shop, I was shown the Kimber Rimfire, in a 1911 style. I found this handgun to be very pleasing to me, both in terms of feel and balance, as well as weight. Then, I compared it to the Custom II, which was heavier, and I actually preferred that over the aluminum alloy frame of the Rimfire.
I am in a quandry, because I didn't really want to spend almost $700 for a .22LR pistol. I had planned, actually, on spending not too much more than $400 for a blued Ruger.
I can purchase the Custom II for about $640, and another $275 or so will get me the .22LR conversion kit, basically giving me two guns for under $1,000. While substantially more than what I wanted to pay, it may be a worthwhile investment at that price, but I am not sure.
This will be my first gun that I've owned, and needless to say, I'm very leery of making a mistake, especially when it comes to a gun purchase.
I was fortunate (well, kind of) to be able to rent a Springfield 1911 with the Kimber conversion and shoot it. The down side of that was the range I rented it from apparently didn't take really good care of the weapons they rented, and I had a 25% FTF or FTE rate. When the gun was 'deconverted', I looked at the slide and barrel on the conversion, and it was horrible. No wonder the gun didn't work well.
However, I do think that it grouped well at 7 yards or so with the 50' Rifle targets I was using. At least, for someone who hasn't picked up any kind of gun in 25+ years, and the last was a rifle!
So, the question comes down to this:
For someone who is looking to purchase a first time gun for target shooting, on the weekends, not interested in personal carry (at this time, but maybe in the future), and not currently interested in any kind of competition (who knows about that in the future), would you recommend:
A. A Ruger Mk III
B. The Kimber Rimfire in 1911 style
or
C. A Custom II with the Kimber Conversion.
and finally
D. you tell me!
Thank you in advance for helping me. I sure could use it.
By the way, the 1911 is, out of all the guns that I looked at so far, the nicest, and most natural gun I've looked at.
Gary